Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The writer does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are various reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not EightVape based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing how much chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.